← Dr James Thomas
Research Report

# Anomalous Materials Analysis: Evidence of Non-Terrestrial Manufacturing

By Dr James Thomas | Last Updated: 2024

## Executive Summary

Over the past decade, I have had the opportunity to examine or review data from seven distinct material samples alleged to originate from UAP crash retrievals or debris fields. While chain of custody issues prevent definitive conclusions, the materials exhibit characteristics that challenge our understanding of manufacturing processes and, in some cases, isotopic origins.

This report summarizes publicly discussable findings. Certain details remain withheld pending verification and to protect sources.

Key Finding: Multiple samples exhibit isotopic ratios for common elements (magnesium, bismuth, zinc) that do not match any known terrestrial, lunar, or meteoritic sources. This suggests either an unknown natural process or deliberate engineering by a technologically advanced civilization.

## The Isotope Problem

Every element exists in multiple isotopic forms. Magnesium, for example, has three stable isotopes: Mg-24, Mg-25, and Mg-26. On Earth, these occur in consistent ratios regardless of where you sample - approximately 79% Mg-24, 10% Mg-25, and 11% Mg-26.

These ratios are so consistent that geochemists use them as fingerprints. Meteorites have slightly different ratios. Lunar samples differ again. By examining isotopic ratios, we can determine where material originated in our solar system.

Several UAP material samples show isotopic ratios that match nothing in our solar system.

Sample MT-7 (Magnesium Layer) - Isotopic Analysis
Mg-24: 93.7% (Earth: 78.99%)
Mg-25: 4.2% (Earth: 10.00%)
Mg-26: 2.1% (Earth: 11.01%)
Deviation from terrestrial baseline: Statistically impossible through natural processes

## Layered Metamaterials

Perhaps more compelling than isotopic anomalies is the physical structure of certain samples. Several exhibit microscopic layering - alternating layers of different materials at thicknesses measured in microns or nanometers.

The "Art's Parts" samples, famously analyzed by multiple laboratories, consist of alternating layers of bismuth and magnesium-zinc alloy. The bismuth layers are approximately 1-4 microns thick; the magnesium-zinc layers are 100-200 microns thick. This pattern repeats with remarkable consistency.

### Why This Matters

We cannot replicate this structure with current technology. More importantly, we don't know why anyone would create it. The layering serves no obvious purpose for any known application.

However, theoretical work by Dr. Hal Puthoff and others suggests that such structures might interact with electromagnetic fields in unusual ways - potentially relevant to the "impossible" flight characteristics we observe in UAP.

#### A Note on Verification

I want to be clear: I cannot prove these samples came from extraterrestrial craft. Chain of custody is problematic. Some could be elaborate hoaxes or misidentified industrial waste. What I can say is that the materials exhibit properties that demand scientific investigation, and that investigation is being systematically prevented.

## Sample Overview

#### Sample MT-7

Alleged Origin: New Mexico, 1947

Magnesium-dominant alloy with anomalous isotopic signature. Examined by three independent laboratories with consistent results.

#### Art's Parts

Alleged Origin: Unknown, received 1996

Bismuth-magnesium layered metamaterial. Most thoroughly analyzed UAP sample in existence. Structure remains unexplained.

#### Ubatuba Fragments

Alleged Origin: Brazil, 1957

Ultra-pure magnesium fragments. Purity levels exceeded contemporary manufacturing capabilities at time of recovery.

#### Sample DR-4

Alleged Origin: Classified

Cannot discuss specifics. Analysis ongoing. Preliminary results are... significant.

## The Scientific Response

When I present this data to mainstream scientists, I typically receive one of three responses:

1. "The samples are hoaxes." Possible, but doesn't explain how a hoaxer in 1947 created isotopic ratios we couldn't detect until decades later, or how they created microscopic structures we still can't replicate.

2. "The analysis is flawed." Multiple independent laboratories using different methodologies have produced consistent results. At some point, we have to consider that the analysis might be correct.

3. Silence. Most common. Scientists who express interest are quietly advised to drop the subject if they value their careers.

## What These Materials Suggest

If the materials are genuine - and I believe at least some are - they suggest:

Non-Terrestrial Origin: Isotopic signatures indicate manufacturing in a different stellar environment, or deliberate isotopic purification beyond our current capabilities.

Advanced Manufacturing: The precision of layered structures suggests manufacturing technology significantly beyond ours.

Functional Purpose: These aren't decorative or random. The structures appear engineered for a purpose we don't yet understand - possibly related to electromagnetic field manipulation.

Physical Evidence: Unlike lights in the sky, these materials can be held, measured, and tested. They represent the most tangible evidence we have that something genuinely anomalous is occurring.

## The Path Forward

What we need is straightforward: open scientific investigation. Make these materials available to any qualified researcher. Publish all findings in peer-reviewed journals. Let the scientific method work.

What we get instead is classification, ridicule, and career destruction for anyone who takes the subject seriously.

The materials exist. The anomalies are real. The only question is whether we have the intellectual courage to investigate them honestly.

🔬

#### Dr James Thomas

Astrophysicist & UAP Researcher. Former Cambridge, Royal Observatory Fellow. Full Profile

Dr James Thomas is a fictional character. This content is speculative fiction exploring UAP/UFO theories for entertainment and educational purposes only. Any resemblance to real persons is coincidental. See our full disclaimer.